We scored 24 B2B websites against a simple test: can a buyer recognise their situation in the first 30 seconds?
The average score was 13.6/30.
The design is fine.
The site fails at the moment that matters most: helping a buyer recognise their own situation.
Many could not.
-
One $6bn enterprise scored 11/30
-
Homepage: contact form plus "global leader" language
-
Zero connection to the buyer's actual starting point
No buyer reads that and thinks: This is for me.
C๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ฎ. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ง๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐
As April Dunford explains in her revised and updated book, ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐๐๐น๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ, https://amzn.eu/d/0784Bzt1, as markets get more crowded and products easier to build, the real constraint shifts to positioning and distribution.
The buyer is not asking: "What does this company do?"
They are asking: "Is this relevant to my situation, right now?"
Typically, websites answer the first. Very few answer the second.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐.
Every company we assessed already had the right insight:
It was just buried. Case studies. Services pages. Internal language.
They describe what they do. But not why it matters at the moment a buyer decides to act.
T๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ.
If your homepage does not translate the buyer's situation:
This is a positioning problem. It sits upstream of everything else.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ป ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ต:
-
The situation the buyer was in before they searched
-
The trigger that forced action
-
The language they used to describe it
Then they translate that customer truth into decision-ready communication.
The gap between 13.6/30 and a high-performing site is rarely budget or design.
It is whether the company has aligned its message with how buyers actually decide.
We run demand-side website assessments for B2B software and services companies.
If you want to know where your site sits, the framework is at shift90.partners.